Not much to say here. Got some fresh textures and just had to make a little test map to play with them, although it’s not exactly “little” anymore…I’ve been playing Halo 3 recently–actually playing video games is a rare occurrence for me, since I prefer creating worlds to destroying them–and I found the huge expanses and conceptual grandness of some of the maps in that game to be inspiring, as in the first two Halo games. (Especially the “High Charity” levels.)
I’ve been playing Halo 4 too much…
I have no idea how to turn this into a playable Unvanquished map just yet. In particular, the wall-walking ability of the alien team could make this room a potential pain in the posterior for the human team. Still…I like it.
Forgot to post about this. Unvanquished Alpha 22 was released recently, and one of the new inclusions is the latest version of my map, Snowstation!
Here’s the release article, and here’s the article on the map.
Snowstation is a small map in development for the multiplayer Quake III-based FPS/RTS game Unvanquished. It sports an asymmetrical layout and varied indoor/outdoor locations. It also utilizes the newer rendering features offered by Unvanquished, making it one of the few maps to do so. It will be shipped with the game When It’s Done (TM), which should be in a few weeks.
The current release is beta 3, which added weather effects and some minor tweaks to the human base. Unfortunately the weather effect does not seem to work on all computers. I am trying to figure out why…
For now, however, Unvanquished players can try the map out for themselves. It is in rotation on the development servers and can be voted into play with “/callvote nextmap snowstation-b3”.
You can download it from here: http://unvanquished.net/downloads/main/map-snowstation-b3.pk3
Human Base exterior
Alien Base exterior
It’s been awhile since I’ve dealt with the capacitor plague. I recently inherited this elderly (1.8GHz Pentium 4, 1GB SDRAM, 40GB hard drive) box from a friend who is now happily rocking out with a new computer powered by a much more modern and power-friendly dual-core AMD CPU. Naturally, the first thing I did (after cackling and rubbing my hands together with glee) was to open the case and shove the ribbon cables aside. Oh. Hello.
I’m surprised it still runs. In fact, as far as I can tell, it runs as steady as a rock, although how a rock can run is beyond me. (After all, a rock has no legs.) Of course, if it had been some of the larger caps near the CPU, it probably wouldn’t be running very long at all.
Time to pull out memtest86+ and prime95.
“When Caps Go Bad…”
Earlier this week, HughesNet scheduled a maintenance outage to do whatever it is that they need to do for maintenance (which, in the past, has included replacing equipment damaged by golf-ball sized hail at the ground stations). When the connection came back up early the next morning, it was plagued by mysterious and intermittent RSTs on HTTP connections and 2% packet loss. Owch! Having approximately 320268309285049386509258 errands to run, I didn’t get to examine the connection until last night…
Disclaimer: This issue has recently (September-ish) been fixed by HughesNet (thank you!) in a firmware update to the HT1000 modem. I am reposting the old article for historical purposes.
The HT1000 modem has a configuration/status webpage called the “System Control Center” (SCC) at the IP address 192.168.0.1. Certain malformed URL within the SCC will cause an arbitrary command to be executed on the modem as an unprivileged user.
This security hole is related to the command to enable and disable Web Acceleration.
HughesNet offers native IPv6 support (including routed prefixes) on their HT1000/HT1100 GEN4 systems. If you don’t know what IPv6 is, then fix yourself some tea, settle in, and skim through these primers on IPv6. It’s very nice to see that HughesNet is embracing the future of the Internet by allowing its customers to use IPv6 without having to configure a tunnel–most other ISPs don’t yet offer native IPv6.
As a HughesNet customer, I frequent the HughesNet community support forums. There are some questions that I see asked very often there and elsewhere. Since the community forum has no sticky posts and the official knowledge base is woefully out of date, I compiled my own for prospective and current HughesNet GEN4 users.
HughesNet GEN4 Networking FAQ: Describes the HughesNet GEN4 HT1000 modem’s peculiar quirks and offers tips on integrating it into a home or small business network.
HughesNet GEN4 General FAQ: Anything else I could think of related to the GEN4 system.
They are a constant work-in-progress. HughesNet has released an HT1100 modem recently, but without getting my hands on one, I don’t know if it acts the same as the HT1000. If anyone has one of these modems and can verify or rebut a question in the FAQs, please get in touch with me!
I created a new webpage for QuotaMonitor, a small Linux taskbar app to monitor data usage on the HughesNet HT1000 and HN9000 modems.
Version 1.4 has been uploaded. Thanks to the work of capnchaos64 at the dslreports.com forums, the applet now can display the raw data being parsed from the modem as well as some HN9000-specific information. It also can reboot the modem now.
Update: Whoops, I was wrong about the DNS cache. It apparently does allow you to specify your own nameservers on your router/computer without forcibly redirecting the query to HughesNet’s DNS servers. But the modem still caches the response and still offers no way to clear the cache.
Until recently, I had a dial-up connection. An aging Zoom 28.8k serial modem served as the gateway to the outside world for a farm of eight equally antiquated computers. This is too many computers fighting over an amount of bandwidth that is simply too small, no matter how it is divided up.
Early this year, my family switched to a HughesNet satellite connection. Soon we had a shiny HughesNet satellite dish in the yard and a sleek HughesNet modem—the HT1000 Satellite Modem—on my desk, ready to fling my packets into outer space like a digital catapult.
(Side note: in about 4.4 years, the signal will reach Alpha Centauri. What will the aliens there make of all our cat videos? Assuming there are aliens there, of course. But I digress.)
This would be great, or so I thought. Just hook it up to the network, configure the spare NIC on my old Linux box to accept a dynamic IP address, tell IPTables to masquerade all traffic through that interface. Nothing to it.
But the HT1000 is a fiddly beast. It doesn’t play nice with existing networking equipment for three reasons.